Tag

#ai dev workflow

68 posts tagged.

Context engineering is four mechanisms, not one

Context engineering on the Claude platform is not a setting. It is four mechanisms at four points in the pipeline, and the one everybody enables first pays for context window with prompt cache.

14 min read199
AI dev workflow

Context rot: two guards, split by model, and one model gets neither

Context rot is real and Anthropic now names it in its own docs. The useful question in 2026 is narrower: your Claude model ships with one of two self regulation mechanisms, or with neither, and they do not overlap. Sonnet and Haiku get context awareness free and automatic. Opus needs a beta header. Opus 4.6 gets nothing.

12 min read218
AI dev workflow

Claude Opus vs Sonnet: what breaks when you swap the model string

Comparisons of Claude Opus, Sonnet and Haiku score capability, speed and price per token. None of them mention that the model string is part of your request contract. Swap it and thinking can turn itself on, your answer can move out of content[0], and a max_tokens you never touched can start truncating. Eight measured differences, September 2026.

13 min read135
AI dev workflow

Claude Code behind a proxy: which safety nets stop running (2026)

A proxy changes where Claude Code's requests go. It also changes which of its own safety nets are still running. The credential variable is a header choice, the base URL alone does not move your billing, and a gateway context limit turns off auto compact recovery. Field log, September 2026.

10 min read225
AI dev workflow

Claude Code model: which setting actually wins (2026)

I went looking for which model was answering me and found three separate precedence orders, fourteen documented inputs, and two environment variables that resolve in opposite directions. Read from Anthropic's own docs on 9 September 2026, with the version numbers.

8 min read219